who here thinks that inzectors are no skill and require no talent to use? i also thing that wind ups and dinorabbit are falling, if not, have already fallen into this category? what do ya'll think?

Yah, I wouldn't say it requires a decent amount of skill to use them. There's not a lot of decision making going on. The cards tell you what to do and that's that. In addition, I think they're pretty overpowered as well. "Hey, I'll blow up your field this turn but why stop there?..My next turn and the turn after that all while swarming on my field. K?" That kind of leads to them playing with themselves which gets boring. Hence why I'll just leave a duel if I find out I'm playing an Inzektor deck. If I wanted to take a nap, I'd do it while I'm not on DN.

shadowfox18 wrote:who here thinks that inzectors are no skill and require no talent to use? i also thing that wind ups and dinorabbit are falling, if not, have already fallen into this category? what do ya'll think?

It's been worse lol. Maybe next banlist we will have some better options.

Jimi wrote:Yah, I wouldn't say it requires a decent amount of skill to use them. There's not a lot of decision making going on. The cards tell you what to do and that's that. In addition, I think they're pretty overpowered as well. "Hey, I'll blow up your field this turn but why stop there?..My next turn and the turn after that all while swarming on my field. K?" That kind of leads to them playing with themselves which gets boring. Hence why I'll just leave a duel if I find out I'm playing an Inzektor deck. If I wanted to take a nap, I'd do it while I'm not on DN.

Dino-rabbits are worse for being easy to play, especially with leviar, but in addition to that, both of these decks are easy to side against. Chain Disappearance and Veilers **** up everything.

Dex♥ wrote:

shadowfox18 wrote:who here thinks that inzectors are no skill and require no talent to use? i also thing that wind ups and dinorabbit are falling, if not, have already fallen into this category? what do ya'll think?

It's been worse lol. Maybe next banlist we will have some better options.

Jimi wrote:Yah, I wouldn't say it requires a decent amount of skill to use them. There's not a lot of decision making going on. The cards tell you what to do and that's that. In addition, I think they're pretty overpowered as well. "Hey, I'll blow up your field this turn but why stop there?..My next turn and the turn after that all while swarming on my field. K?" That kind of leads to them playing with themselves which gets boring. Hence why I'll just leave a duel if I find out I'm playing an Inzektor deck. If I wanted to take a nap, I'd do it while I'm not on DN.

Dino-rabbits are worse for being easy to play, especially with leviar, but in addition to that, both of these decks are easy to side against. Chain Disappearance and Veilers **** up everything.

I'll admit, Inzektors are not as auto-pilot as Sams were a format or two ago (and still kinda are).
However, they're much deadlier and much more broken. Sams at least gave you some turns as it slowly massacred your field and triple Shi en stopped your S/Ts (if you were lucky). Inzektors just flat-out nuke your field & spam theirs. The more you have to blow up, the more they can summon. Full field isn't as easy to nuke, but they have ways of making their turn all the more deadly.

As for sideability, you can side against many decks, doesn't mean you're guaranteed a win, nor does it mean Inzektors still can't wriggle their way around your sided cards. Don't even get me started on the probabilities of drawing what you need when you need, etc, etc.

Imo, permaban Hornet. It's what fuels the OPedness of Inzektors, and honestly I don't think anyone would care about them anymore if it were. The spamming & Xyzing & whatnot is expected out of most decks nowadays, but the nuking is what makes the Inzektors as hated as they are now, and as loved by bandwagoners.

Hence why this format has been called the "money format".

If Konami had any intention of making the game based on what a majority of the people in the game would want, Inzektors wouldn'tve been made. I'm sure they were made to be abused until Konami makes enough money on them to move on.

Well to be exact it takes more skills then running "Chaos Dragons" lols. There are many variants how you make the OTK, so it does take skill. ~ again, not like Chaos Dragons.

Chaos Dragons, Inzektor, Rabbit, etc- sure, they're boring to face (meh) but it isn't fun losing is it?

glad to see ya'll agree with me. do you think that i should make an inzector or windup deck for testing, or stick with what i have?

Don't use a crappy deck.

and what decks do you use?

Any deck that doesn't suck.

which is? come on! gimmie an idea so that i dont suck so much! because youre obviously better than me.

Alright then get on DN in 20 minutes. I'll give you ideas along with an arena duel.

Evilswarms. There. Ate up JJBox and everyone else who challenged me :3

evilswarms is scary...T.T

I'm gonna guess Rabbitswarm in particular, Jimi? Or are you one of the few to actually make and use a pure build?

you dont find many pure breed decks any more. yugioh is now like going to the westminster dog show and finding muts in the line-up

so true. :/

Oz wrote:I'm gonna guess Rabbitswarm in particular, Jimi? Or are you one of the few to actually make and use a pure build?

No, my build is pure. I like it that way and have had better luck than using the Rabbit variant. I'd much rather have a Veilered Evilswarm Castor than a sitting, helpless rabbit.

evilswarm are the best so yeah <3
and for inzektor shit use traps like skill drain and or dark shadows mirrors and macro

^ this 100%

true. but how oftern do you side against just 1 deck?

Those cards kill most decks so that's pretty much the standard side right now. Though I don't run SIM since all of my monsters are dark aside from to EV.